In Michigan, the Senate race has drawn significant attention due to candidate Haley Stevens and her connection with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). The pro-Israel group and its affiliates have invested nearly $30 million backing Stevens, aiming to defeat the progressive favorite Abdul El-Sayed in the primary on August 4.
Stevens, a well-known congresswoman, frequently discusses her stance on manufacturing and critiques of President Donald Trump. However, she has largely refrained from commenting directly on AIPAC’s involvement. During a campaign stop in West Michigan, Stevens notably avoided mentioning AIPAC, despite its influence in reshaping the race.
Stevens acknowledged the support she receives, attributing it to her dedication to Michigan residents. She emphasized her commitment to serving their interests. The support from AIPAC illustrates a growing divide within Democratic politics, especially as the war in Gaza has brought U.S. support for Israel into question.
AIPAC’s mission centers on strengthening U.S.-Israel relations and promoting security policies for both nations. Yet, both AIPAC and its Super PAC, the United Democracy Project, have refrained from commenting publicly on its substantial financial backing of Stevens.
The Context in Michigan
Specifically in Michigan, the political battle carries weight, given its large Arab American population. Progressive allies of El-Sayed frame this race as a test of grassroots organizing against outsized financial contributions.
New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who supports El-Sayed, noted that high spending traditionally wins races but hopes this can change. Stevens raised less than El-Sayed during the last fundraising period ending June 30. She insists her campaign amasses what it needs to secure victory.
Despite Stevens spending around $1 million on ads, her sponsors have spent $50 million amplifying her campaign. ‘A Stronger Michigan’ is one such organization investing millions without disclosing its supporters. El-Sayed, meanwhile, highlights AIPAC’s financial influence as a major point in his campaign. He criticizes Stevens for being influenced by wealthy donors, supported by allies such as Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Democratic Party’s Divide on Israel
The dramatic financial backing from AIPAC comes as Stevens and El-Sayed express distinctly different views on the Gaza conflict. While Stevens consistently supports Israel, she has criticized Israeli leadership, particularly Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
El-Sayed, an Egyptian immigrant’s son, describes Israel’s military efforts as genocidal and condemns AIPAC’s influence as distorting Democratic policies. He proposes that this influence is a factor in the ongoing war.
The conflict initiated after Hamas’s attacks in October 2023, remains intense with substantial casualties on both sides, making diplomatic solutions seem distant. If elected, El-Sayed would make history as the first Muslim U.S. senator, which has prompted questions about his electability based on his background.
El-Sayed’s campaign relies largely on grassroots efforts, boasting over 10,000 volunteers across Michigan. In contrast, Stevens’ campaign claims hundreds of volunteers statewide.
Broader Party Dynamics
Within the Democratic Party, traditional support for Israel is eroding, which partially stems from the Gaza war’s ramifications. Recently, 103 House Democrats attempted, but failed, to block $3.3 billion in aid to Israel, highlighting internal tensions.
New York Rep. Pat Ryan, facing a change of stance, previously supported Israeli aid and accepted AIPAC’s support. He now disavows further collaboration with AIPAC. Similarly, some Democratic activists have pressured other candidates like Elissa Slotkin to toughen their position on Gaza, reflecting strategic shifts among party members.
While the divide over AIPAC within the Democratic Party is evident, strategists like Adrian Hemond argue that primary voters might prioritize issues like the economy over Israel support concerns.
Leave a Reply