Many Americans often view hunger as a distant issue, associated with faraway countries facing agricultural failures or political instability. This perception places hunger as a problem outside the borders of the United States, not affecting the wealthiest nation. However, statistics reveal a different reality. The USDA reports that approximately 14% of U.S. households struggle with food insecurity. Moreover, one in five children live in families where access to nutritious food is uncertain.
Hunger is an American issue, affecting urban, suburban, and rural communities. Multiple factors contribute to this situation. Housing costs have increased, wages haven’t kept pace with inflation, and essential expenses like gasoline and utilities consume more of household budgets. High food prices often force families to make tough decisions between necessities like rent and groceries or medicine and dinner.
A less-discussed factor exacerbating food insecurity is grocery taxes. While most states do not tax groceries, acknowledging that food is necessary, nine states still impose grocery taxes. In some areas, combined taxes on food items can approach 9%. These states often experience severe food insecurity. For families already struggling, even small increases at the checkout counter can have significant effects.
Research, including studies by university researchers, highlights the impact of grocery taxes on food insecurity. Findings indicate that even a slight 1% increase in tax rates correlates with a nearly 1% rise in food insecurity for low-income households. Grocery taxes disproportionately affect these families, consuming a larger portion of their income.
Additionally, retailers often increase prices beyond the tax itself, a practice known as ‘over-shifting’. This results in shoppers paying more than the tax increase at the register, benefitting retailers rather than the consumer. Discount and dollar stores, frequented by lower-income families, experience this effect more acutely.
Grocery taxes are not the primary cause of hunger in the U.S., but they directly impact families at the checkout line where daily food choices are made. Unlike broader economic factors, these taxes are under state government control. Eliminating grocery taxes requires alternative revenue sources. Progressive tax systems, including more equitable income taxes, could lessen the burden on struggling families. Property taxes or targeted levies on non-essential goods like alcohol and tobacco could also replace grocery taxes without punishing basic food purchases.
Policymakers face trade-offs, but some are harder to justify than others. While taxing groceries is administratively straightforward, its effects are lopsided, burdening those least able to afford them. Hunger in the U.S. is shaped by choices, including the decision to tax fundamental necessities like food.
Harry M. Kaiser, Professor of Applied Economics and Management at Cornell University
Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Leave a Reply