The third day of ACC Media Days delivered unexpected headlines, sparking conversations around the conference’s future and playoff scenarios. SMU Mustangs head coach Rhett Lashlee took the spotlight in Charlotte, sharing insights about the upcoming season for the 2024 ACC Champions.
Lashlee touched on various subjects, including the structure of the Mustangs’ offensive and defensive coordinations, the competitive nature within the ACC, and its implications for the College Football Playoff (CFP) situation.
Comments on CFP Expansion
A noteworthy topic was Lashlee’s recognition of the Duke Blue Devils for their 2025 ACC victory, a sentiment that could stir mixed reactions in Harrisonburg, Virginia. Lashlee argued for ACC representation in the CFP, citing that future rules would ensure each Power 4 conference champion a spot in the competition.
NIL Arms Race Impact
Lashlee noted the positive implications of this change for the Mustangs, who are anticipated to rank high in the league in 2026. The shift in policy could lead to a more competitive playoff tournament.
Addressing Controversy
During his media interaction at Hilton Charlotte Uptown, Lashlee made remarks that seemingly referenced James Madison University, reflecting on their CFP berth under previous rules. In 2025, the top five conference champions secured automatic Playoff spots, leading to JMU’s inclusion despite Duke’s unranked status after a challenging season.
Lashlee’s comments about the ACC champs drew criticism, especially from JMU supporters, who expressed their discontent online. This reaction suggests Lashlee might face a chilly reception in certain areas.
ACC Playoff Predictions
The debate continued with considerations whether teams like Notre Dame might have been more fitting CFP contenders, though those discussions remain separate from Lashlee’s current focus.
Envisioning an SMU versus JMU pairing in the playoff’s first round could provide thrilling competition. Still, as far as coaching positions go, Lashlee’s association with James Madison seems improbable.

Leave a Reply